The Best Food Processors
After spending months testing more than 20 food processors in our test kitchen, I can confidently say that finding the right one completely transforms how you cook. We’ve chopped thousands of onions, shredded mountains of cheese, and made enough pie dough to feed a small army. Through all that testing, we’ve learned what actually matters when you’re investing in a food processor.
Here’s the thing: not all food processors are created equal. We’ve watched some struggle with basic tasks while others powered through everything we threw at them. The difference between a mediocre processor and a great one isn’t just about power—it’s about thoughtful design, durability, and how well it handles real-world cooking tasks.
Everything We Recommend
✅ We recommend these products based on an intensive research process that’s designed to cut through the noise and find the top products in this space. Guided by experts, we spend hours looking into the factors that matter to bring you these selections.
⭐ 2.5 million+ people assisted in the last 30 days ⭐
🏆
The Best Overall
The 720-watt Cuisinart food processor handles dips, purees, soups, and sauces with a 14-cup capacity.
Features include On/Off and Pulse buttons, an extra-large feed tube, and a detachable disc stem for easy cleaning.
Includes 4mm slicing disc, medium shredding disc, stainless-steel chopping blade, spatula, and recipe booklet.
Note: Blades are fixed and non-adjustable; read the user manual before setup for safe use.
Comes with a 5-year motor warranty and 3-year limited parts warranty; BPA-free construction.
💎
The Best Premium
16-cup Breville Sous Chef 16 delivers precision slicing and consistent results for effortless gourmet meals.
Access 1000+ guided recipes and live cooking classes through Breville+ for expert culinary inspiration.
Includes 24-size adjustable slicer, reversible shredder, French fry disk, and micro-serrated S-blade.
Features a 5.5-inch 3-in-1 feed chute, reducing pre-cutting with precise results for all food sizes.
Powered by a 1450W induction motor with a 30-year warranty, a BPA-free 121 fl. oz bowl, and a full accessory set.
The Best Compact Budget Option
Built-in bowl scraper lets you process ingredients continuously without removing the lid or stopping.
450-watt Hamilton Beach processor slices, shreds, chops, mixes, and purees with stainless steel attachments.
Features 2 speeds plus pulse for precise control across a variety of recipes and textures.
10-cup bowl with large feed chute reduces pre-cutting and handles big batches efficiently.
BPA-free, dishwasher-safe parts with suction feet and 1-year warranty ensure safety and easy cleanup.
The Best for Large Batches
1200-peak-watt Ninja food processor easily powers through tough ingredients for smooth, precise results.
Features 4 Auto-IQ preset programs for effortless chopping, slicing, shredding, pureeing, and dough mixing.
Includes 12-cup processing bowl, XL feed chute with 3-part pusher, and reversible shredding disc.
Dishwasher-safe blades, discs, and bowls ensure fast cleanup and quick assembly for daily use.
Durable design includes a dough blade, an adjustable slicing disc, and a 10-recipe guide for versatile cooking.
The Best Value Mid-Range
13-cup KitchenAid food processor includes an in-bowl storage caddy for all blades and discs.
Adjust slicing thickness easily with the externally controlled Exact Slice disc for perfect cuts.
Twist-free, one-click bowl assembly and leak-resistant design make setup and cleaning effortless.
3-in-1 feed tube handles various ingredient sizes, reducing prep time for faster meal prep.
Includes multi-purpose blade, dough blade, slicing and shredding discs, and storage caddy for versatility.
The Best Budget
1000-peak-watt Ninja food processor powers through tough ingredients for smooth, consistent results.
Features 4 Auto-IQ preset programs for one-touch chopping, slicing, pureeing, and dough making.
9-cup capacity bowl handles large batches for family meals, parties, or weekly meal prep.
Includes stainless steel precision blades and a dough blade for even cuts and perfect mixing.
BPA-free, dishwasher-safe parts with a safety lock and sleek silver design for easy, durable use.
Why Trust Our Testing?
Our assessment team has collectively spent over 800 hours testing food processors over the past year. We’re not just running basic tests—we’re using these machines the way you would in your own kitchen. We’ve made salsa for game day parties, prepped vegetables for weeknight dinners, and even tested how well each processor handles the notoriously tricky task of making perfect pie crust.
Unlike single-test reviews, we’ve continued using our top picks for months after initial testing to see how they hold up over time. This long-term perspective has revealed issues that don’t show up in quick tests, like how certain models develop leaks or how blade sharpness degrades over repeated use.
What We Tested and How We Tested It
Our testing methodology was designed to replicate real-world cooking scenarios while also pushing each processor to its limits. We wanted to understand not just whether a processor could complete a task, but how well it performed, how easy it was to use, and whether the results justified the price.
Chopping Performance
We chopped hundreds of onions during testing, counting the number of pulses required to achieve uniform dice. We evaluated piece size consistency and noted any crushing or mushiness. The best processors produced uniform pieces in 8-10 pulses without reducing any portion to mush.
We also tested chopping softer items like fresh herbs and harder items like carrots and celery. This range helped us understand how different blade designs and motor speeds affected results across various ingredient textures.
Slicing and Shredding
We sliced tomatoes, cucumbers, potatoes, and hard cheeses, evaluating uniformity and examining the first and last slices for consistency. Some processors produced perfect initial slices but deteriorated toward the end of the batch, indicating poor pressure distribution from the food pusher.
Shredding tests included both soft cheeses and hard cheeses. We measured how much cheese was left un-shredded on the disc and evaluated whether shreds were consistently sized or included random larger pieces.
Dough Making
Pizza dough and pie crust dough provided our toughest tests. We monitored whether motors struggled or overheated, evaluated dough consistency, and noted how well blades incorporated ingredients without overworking the dough.
This test was particularly revealing. Several processors we tested couldn’t handle a full batch of pizza dough without the motor bogging down significantly. The best performers powered through without any signs of strain.
Emulsification
Making mayonnaise tests a processor’s ability to maintain consistent speed and blade rotation while creating stable emulsions. We measured how easily oil could be added through the feed tube and whether the finished mayonnaise achieved proper texture and stability.
Cleaning
After each test, we evaluated how easily food residue could be removed from all components. We noted any design features that trapped food and how components fared in the dishwasher after repeated washing cycles. Some processors showed wear on their plastic bowls after just a few weeks of testing, while others looked nearly new after months of daily use.
Noise Levels
Using a decibel meter, we measured noise output during operation. While not a primary factor in our recommendations, noise levels mattered to our testers, especially those who prep ingredients early in the morning or late at night when family members are sleeping.
Long-Term Durability
Unlike many reviews that test processors for a few weeks, we continued using our top picks for several months. This extended testing revealed issues that don’t show up immediately, such as bowl cracking, seal degradation, and motor performance decline.
Best Food Processor Our Picks
Price: $220-$329 | Capacity: 14 cups | Motor: 720 watts | Warranty: 5-year limited warranty on entire unit, 3-year motor warranty
The Cuisinart DFP-14BCNY has earned its reputation as a kitchen workhorse, and after putting it through months of real-world testing, I completely understand why. This is the food processor that finally made me stop dreading meal prep and actually look forward to cooking on busy weeknights.
What immediately struck me about this processor was how it just works—every single time, without drama. You know that frustration when you’re trying to get dinner on the table and your kitchen equipment decides to act up? That’s never happened with this Cuisinart. Whether I’m chopping onions for a quick stir-fry or shredding a mountain of cheese for taco night with the kids, it handles everything with the same steady, reliable performance.
The 720-watt motor might not sound impressive on paper compared to some thousand-watt competitors, but here’s what actually matters: this motor never bogs down or struggles, even when I’m processing a full bowl of vegetables or kneading pizza dough for Friday night dinner. It’s the difference between raw power and smart engineering. During one particularly ambitious weekend, I made three batches of hummus for a party, processed vegetables for a week’s worth of meal prep, and still had energy left to make pie dough. The motor didn’t even get warm.
The 14-cup capacity hits that sweet spot perfectly. It’s large enough that I’m not constantly processing multiple batches (which honestly makes me want to give up and order takeout), but it’s not so massive that it dominates my counter or requires a small moving truck to get it in and out of storage. When I’m making salsa for game day, I can fit a whole batch in one go. When my neighbor asked to borrow it for Thanksgiving prep, she processed enough vegetables for twelve people without needing to empty and refill.
Here’s something that might seem small but has made a huge difference in my daily life: this thing is ridiculously easy to clean. After years of battling with complicated food processors that had a million crevices and parts, the Cuisinart’s straightforward design feels like a breath of fresh air. I can have it completely washed and put away in under three minutes. On those nights when I’m already exhausted and facing a sink full of dishes, knowing the food processor cleanup is quick actually makes me more likely to use it.
The build quality speaks to why people are still using 10-year-old versions of this exact model. Mine has a satisfying weight to it—substantial without being awkward. The bowl locks into place with a definite click that makes me confident it’s secure. I’ve never had any wobbling or shifting, even when processing tough ingredients at full speed. My sister-in-law has the earlier version of this processor that she’s been using almost daily for over twelve years, and it still runs like new. That’s the kind of longevity that makes the upfront investment feel smart rather than scary.
During our chopping tests, this processor delivered consistently uniform pieces in just 10 quick pulses. I’ve tested it against food processors costing $400 or more, and honestly? The chopping results were virtually identical. The same goes for slicing and shredding. The 4mm slicing disc produces even, precise cuts whether I’m working with soft tomatoes or rock-hard carrots. For making coleslaw, scalloped potatoes, or any dish where consistent slicing matters, this processor delivers professional-level results.
Now, let’s talk about the trade-offs, because no product is perfect. The feed tube is narrower than some premium models, which means larger vegetables need to be cut into smaller pieces before processing. If you’re someone who processes whole vegetables regularly, this might feel like extra work. However, after using this processor for months, I’ve found the pre-cutting takes maybe an extra minute or two, and it’s a small price to pay for everything else this machine does so well.
The design is straightforward and functional rather than flashy. If you’re the type who wants all your appliances to look like they belong in a design magazine, the Cuisinart’s utilitarian appearance might not thrill you. But here’s my take: I’d rather have a food processor that performs brilliantly for a decade than one that looks pretty but stops working after two years.
What sealed the deal for me was realizing this processor has actually changed how I cook. I’m meal prepping more because it’s not a hassle. I’m trying new recipes that I would have previously skipped because the prep work seemed daunting. Just last week, I made homemade pesto, processed vegetables for a week’s worth of stir-fries, and whipped up a batch of tahini sauce—all tasks that would have felt overwhelming without this processor making them genuinely easy.
Pros:
- Exceptional value delivering premium performance at a mid-range price
- Rock-solid durability backed by users with 10+ year-old models still going strong
- Consistent, reliable results across every task without any guesswork
- Quick and easy cleanup that doesn’t make you regret using it
- Straightforward controls that anyone can master without reading the manual
- 5-year motor warranty shows manufacturer confidence in longevity
Cons:
- A narrower feed tube means pre-cutting larger vegetables
- Basic aesthetic won’t impress design-focused buyers
- No built-in storage solution for attachments and blades
Price: $449-$549 | Capacity: 16 cups | Motor: 1450 watts | Warranty: 2-year limited warranty, 30-year motor warranty
If you’ve ever felt limited by your food processor—if you’ve wished for more power, more capacity, or more precision—the Breville Sous Chef BFP810 is the answer you’ve been waiting for. After months of testing, I can honestly say this processor has transformed how I approach cooking, especially when I’m tackling ambitious recipes or meal prepping for the entire week.
The first thing that blew me away was the sheer power of the 1450-watt motor. This isn’t just about impressive numbers on the spec sheet—it’s about what that power actually means in your kitchen. When I’m making pizza dough for the family, the motor doesn’t even hesitate. When I’m grinding hard parmesan into powder for pasta night, it powers through without the slightest slowdown. I’ve tested numerous food processors that claim to be powerful but then struggle when asked to perform demanding tasks. The Breville? It’s the real deal.
What really sets this processor apart is the 3-in-1 feed chute system with that massive 5.5-inch extra-wide tube. This feature alone has saved me countless hours of prep time. Last weekend, I was making a huge batch of vegetable soup, and I could fit whole tomatoes, bell peppers cut in half, and even large onion halves straight through without any pre-cutting. My old processor would have required me to stand there for 15 minutes, chopping everything into smaller pieces first. With the Breville, I was done in less than five minutes. For anyone who meal preps on Sundays or cooks for large families, this time savings is absolutely game-changing.
But here’s the clever part: Breville included smaller feed tubes that nest inside the large one for when you’re processing smaller ingredients. Ever tried to process a couple of garlic cloves in a huge feed tube and watched them just bounce around uselessly? That doesn’t happen here. The adjustable feed chute adapts to whatever you’re processing, from tiny shallots to enormous potatoes.
The micro-serrated S-blade is another standout feature that makes a real difference in everyday cooking. I’ve processed everything from delicate herbs to tough raw beets, and this blade handles it all without crushing or bruising. When I made mayonnaise last week, the blade’s design created perfect emulsification without any of the splitting or separation I’ve experienced with other processors. The result was restaurant-quality mayo that my guests couldn’t believe was homemade.
The LCD timer initially seemed like one of those features that would be nice but not essential. I was wrong. When recipes call for specific processing times—like when you’re making pastry dough and need to pulse for exactly 30 seconds—the timer is invaluable. I’ve also found it helps me understand how long different tasks actually take, which has made me more efficient in the kitchen overall.
The adjustable slicing disc with 24 different thickness settings has become one of my favorite features. Making potato gratin? I can slice them paper-thin for elegant, professional-looking layers. Prepping vegetables for roasting? Thicker slices that hold their shape in the oven. Before, I would have needed multiple slicing discs to achieve this versatility, and honestly, I probably would have just stuck with one thickness because swapping discs is annoying.
The build quality is exceptional in a way that you can feel the moment you take it out of the box. Everything feels substantial and precisely engineered. The BPA-free plastic bowl is noticeably thicker than standard processors, the metal components feel solid, and the way everything locks together inspires confidence. This is clearly built to last for decades, not just a few years. The storage case for all the attachments is thoughtfully designed, too—no more digging through drawers trying to find the right blade.
Now, let’s be real about the investment. At around $500, this processor costs significantly more than our overall winner. The question you need to ask yourself is: how much do you cook, and how ambitious are your cooking projects? If you’re someone who uses a food processor a few times a month for basic tasks, the Cuisinart will serve you perfectly well and save you $250. But if you’re cooking multiple times a week, regularly tackling complex recipes, or meal prepping for a family, the Breville’s premium features pay for themselves through time savings and superior results.
The size is substantial, which is both a pro and a con depending on your kitchen situation. If you have limited counter or cabinet space, you’ll need to consider whether you can accommodate this larger processor. I keep mine on the counter because I use it almost daily, but it does have a significant footprint.
Who is this processor perfect for? The serious home cook who watches cooking shows and actually tries those recipes. The parent who meal preps every Sunday to make weeknight dinners manageable. The baker who regularly makes pastry and bread dough. The entertainer who frequently cooks for groups. If any of these descriptions fit you, this processor will become your kitchen MVP.
Pros:
- Exceptionally powerful 1450-watt motor handles the toughest ingredients effortlessly
- Extra-wide 5.5-inch feed tube dramatically reduces prep time
- 24-position adjustable slicing disc offers incredible versatility
- Premium build quality designed for decades of use
- Micro-serrated blade produces superior results across all tasks
- LCD timer provides precision for recipe-specific processing times
- The storage case keeps all attachments organized and accessible
Cons:
- Premium price point requires significant investment
- Large footprint demands ample storage space
- A more complex design means more parts to wash
- It may be overkill for casual cooks who use a processor occasionally
Price: $79-$99 | Capacity: 9 cups | Motor: 1000 peak watts | Warranty: 1-year limited warranty
Finding a food processor that actually works well for under $100 feels like discovering a hidden treasure, and the Ninja Professional Plus BN601 is exactly that. After testing this against processors costing three and four times as much, I was genuinely shocked by how well it performs. This is the processor that proves you don’t need to drain your bank account to get serious cooking done.
The first time I used the Ninja, I kept waiting for it to struggle or fail somehow—because how could something this affordable actually work this well? But it powered through everything I threw at it without complaint. The 1000 peak watts of power is more than enough for everyday cooking tasks. I’ve chopped vegetables for stir-fries, made hummus, ground nuts into butter, shredded cheese for tacos, and even tackled pizza dough without any issues. Sure, it’s not going to win a power contest against the Breville’s 1450 watts, but for the cooking most of us do on Tuesday nights, the power difference simply doesn’t matter.
What really won me over was how this processor handles the tasks I actually do most often. Chopping onions? Perfect uniform pieces in about 8-10 pulses. Making salsa? The tomatoes, onions, and peppers all process evenly without turning into mush. Processing fresh herbs for pesto? Clean cuts without bruising or turning everything into a paste. These are the real-world tasks that matter, and the Ninja handles them beautifully.
The Auto-iQ technology is one of those features I initially thought might be gimmicky, but it’s proven surprisingly useful. Basically, it’s preset programs that combine pulsing and continuous processing in patterns optimized for different tasks. When I’m making dough, I can press the dough button and walk away to grab ingredients for the next step without babysitting the processor. For someone new to using a food processor, these presets take the guesswork out of how long to process different ingredients.
The 9-cup capacity is perfectly sized for small to medium families or anyone living in an apartment. My husband and I can prep dinner for the week in a couple of batches, which honestly isn’t inconvenient given how quickly this thing works. For single-serving or couple-sized recipes, the capacity is actually ideal because you’re not trying to process tiny amounts in a huge bowl where ingredients just fly around without actually getting processed.
One of my favorite things about this processor is how compact it is. I have a small kitchen with limited counter space, and this Ninja fits comfortably without dominating the room. It stores easily in a lower cabinet, and I can actually lift it out and put it away without needing to do stretches first. If you’ve ever struggled with those massive, heavy processors, you’ll appreciate how manageable this one is.
Cleaning is straightforward and quick, which matters more than most people realize when they’re buying a food processor. All the removable parts are dishwasher safe, and the simple design means there aren’t a million crevices where food gets trapped. I can have it washed and put away in under three minutes, which means I’m actually willing to pull it out on busy weeknights. A food processor that’s annoying to clean is a food processor that sits unused in your cabinet.
Now, let’s talk about the limitations because they’re important to understand. If you’re planning to process large quantities regularly, the 9-cup capacity will require working in batches. When I made coleslaw for a party, I had to do two batches instead of one. Not a huge deal, but worth knowing upfront.
The processor did show some limitations with extremely hard ingredients. When I tried processing completely frozen fruit for a smoothie bowl, it struggled more than the premium models. However, letting the fruit thaw for just 5-10 minutes solved the problem entirely. For making very stiff dough in large quantities, you might find the motor working harder than ideal. But for standard pizza dough or pastry dough in normal-sized batches, it handles the job fine.
The slicing and shredding discs produce good but not perfect results. When I sliced vegetables for a gratin, the slices were mostly uniform with occasional thicker or thinner pieces. For everyday cooking, this is absolutely acceptable. For fancy dinner parties where presentation is critical, you might notice the difference compared to premium models.
Here’s my take: if you’re someone who uses a food processor two to four times a week for standard tasks like chopping vegetables, shredding cheese, making hummus or pesto, and occasional dough, the Ninja Professional Plus will serve you beautifully. It’s also perfect for anyone new to food processors who wants to test the waters without a major financial commitment. The money you save versus a premium processor could go toward quality knives, a good cutting board, or ingredients for a fancy dinner.
On the flip side, if you’re meal prepping for a family of six every Sunday, processing huge quantities for canning, or regularly making complex recipes that push equipment to its limits, you might find the Ninja’s limitations frustrating. In that case, investing in one of our higher-capacity recommendations would be smarter.
Pros:
- Exceptional value delivers surprisingly strong performance under $100
- 1000 peak watts provides ample power for everyday cooking tasks
- Auto-iQ preset programs simplify operation for beginners
- Compact design perfect for small kitchens and easy storage
- Quick, easy cleanup with dishwasher-safe parts
- Lightweight and manageable to move around
- Handles standard cooking tasks as well as processors costing much more
Cons:
- 9-cup capacity requires batching for large quantities
- Struggles with extremely hard or frozen ingredients
- Slicing consistency doesn’t quite match premium models
- Lighter construction feels less substantial than high-end processors
- Motor can work harder on very stiff doughs in large batches
Price: $129-$170 | Capacity: 12 cups | Motor: 1200 peak watts
When you’re feeding a family of five or six, or you’re the person everyone counts on to bring a huge batch of something to potlucks and parties, capacity matters more than almost anything else. The Ninja Professional XL NF701 was designed for exactly these situations, and after using it for everything from weekly meal prep to holiday cooking marathons, I can say it absolutely delivers.
The 12-cup capacity is where this processor really shines. Last Sunday, I prepped vegetables for an entire week of dinners in a single session—onions, peppers, carrots, celery, broccoli, and cauliflower—without needing to stop and empty the bowl between vegetables. When I made coleslaw for my daughter’s graduation party (we’re talking enough for 30 people), I processed the entire batch in one go. If you’ve ever stood at your counter doing batch after batch after batch with a smaller processor, you’ll understand why this larger capacity is genuinely life-changing.
The 1200 peak watts of power mean this processor doesn’t just have capacity—it has the muscle to actually process those large quantities effectively. I’ve filled this bowl to near capacity with firm vegetables, and the motor powers through without any slowdown or struggle. When I’m making a triple batch of pizza dough for Friday night with the kids and their friends, the motor handles the load without even breathing hard.
What really impressed me was how the Ninja XL maintains even processing even when the bowl is full. With some large-capacity processors I’ve tested, ingredients at the top barely get touched while stuff at the bottom turns to mush. The Ninja’s blade design and bowl shape create better circulation, so vegetables at every level get processed consistently. When I’m chopping onions for a big pot of chili, I get uniform pieces throughout the entire batch.
The two-blade system is particularly clever. You get both a chopping blade and a dough blade, which means you can optimize performance for different tasks. The specialized dough blade has made a noticeable difference when I’m making bread or pizza dough—it kneads without overworking the gluten, which results in better texture. Having the right tool for each job rather than trying to make one blade do everything is one of those small details that makes a real difference in your results.
The two discs (one for slicing, one for shredding) work well for the price point. I’ve sliced potatoes for multiple gratins, shredded cabbage for enormous batches of coleslaw, and processed cheese for what feels like a thousand tacos. While the precision isn’t quite at the level of the Breville’s adjustable disc, for everyday family cooking, these discs get the job done reliably.
The feed chute is reasonably wide, accommodating most vegetables with minimal pre-cutting. I can fit a whole tomato, a large onion cut in half, or a full bell pepper. This speeds up prep considerably when you’re working with large quantities. Time savings compound quickly—shaving two minutes off prep time for each vegetable means saving 15-20 minutes when you’re processing multiple types.
One feature I’ve come to really appreciate is how stable this processor stays on the counter. Even when processing a full bowl of firm vegetables at high speed, there’s no walking or vibrating across the counter. The suction feet grip well, and the motor weight keeps everything planted. This might seem minor until you’ve chased a lightweight processor across your counter mid-chop.
Cleaning a larger processor is obviously more work than cleaning a small one, but Ninja has made it as painless as possible. All the parts are dishwasher safe, and the bowl’s smooth interior doesn’t have complicated curves where food gets stuck. I can have the whole thing cleaned and put away in about four minutes, which is totally reasonable given the capacity.
Let’s talk about who this processor is perfect for. If you’re meal prepping for a family every week, this is your processor. If you regularly cook for groups or bring food to gatherings, this is your processor. If you garden and preserve your harvest, making huge batches of salsa or pesto to freeze, this is absolutely your processor. The combination of capacity and power at this price point is hard to beat.
The trade-off is size and storage. This is not a small appliance. It takes up meaningful counter space, and if you’re storing it in a cabinet, you’ll need to make sure you have the room. I keep mine on the counter because I use it almost daily, but if you’re working with limited space, you’ll need to plan accordingly.
The build quality is solid for the price range, though you can feel it’s not quite as heavy-duty as the Cuisinart or Breville. The plastic is thick and durable, but it doesn’t have that premium weight and feel. For the price difference, though, this is a very reasonable trade-off. I’m more concerned with whether it can handle a triple batch of hummus (it absolutely can) than whether it wins a beauty contest.
Is it worth the step up from the smaller Ninja Professional Plus? If you regularly find yourself processing multiple batches because your current processor is too small, absolutely yes. The extra $40-60 investment pays for itself quickly in time savings and reduced frustration. However, if you’re a couple or small family who rarely processes large quantities, the smaller BN601 will serve you perfectly well and save you some money.
Pros:
- 12-cup capacity handles large batches without multiple processing rounds
- 1200 peak watts provides powerful performance even with full loads
- Two-blade system optimizes performance for different tasks
- Excellent price-to-capacity ratio
- Stable operation even when processing at full capacity
- Wide feed chute accommodates larger vegetables with minimal pre-cutting
- Dishwasher-safe parts simplify cleanup
Cons:
- Large footprint requires significant storage space
- Build quality is good, but not premium
- More parts to wash compared to smaller models
- It may be overkill for singles, couples, or small families
Price: $160-$230 | Capacity: 13 cups | Motor: 500 watts
The KitchenAid KFP1318 occupies that perfect middle ground between budget models and premium splurges, and it’s exactly where a lot of home cooks find their sweet spot. After putting this processor through its paces for months, I’ve come to appreciate how it delivers many premium features without the premium price tag that makes your credit card weep.
What immediately stands out about this KitchenAid is the ExactSlice system, and I’m not exaggerating when I say it’s changed how I approach cooking. There’s an external lever on the side that lets you adjust slice thickness from paper-thin to thick-cut without having to stop, remove the lid, and swap out discs. Last week alone, I used this feature to make potato gratin (paper-thin slices), roasted vegetables (medium slices), and cucumber salad (thick slices)—all without any disc swapping or interruption to my workflow. If you’ve ever gotten halfway through slicing vegetables and realized you wanted them thicker or thinner, you’ll understand why this feature is genuinely brilliant.
The 13-cup capacity hits a sweet spot for most families. It’s large enough that I can make a full batch of hummus for the week, process vegetables for multiple meals, or make a big batch of salsa without running out of room. But it’s not so enormous that it feels wasteful when I just need to quickly chop an onion or two. I’ve comfortably used it for everything from small weeknight dinner prep to full-on Sunday meal prep sessions for my family of four.
The 500-watt motor delivers consistent, reliable power. During testing, I processed five pounds of potatoes for a family gathering, and the motor maintained steady speed throughout without any signs of struggle. When I’m making pizza dough or kneading bread dough, it handles the job confidently. It’s not trying to be the most powerful motor on the market, but the engineering is smart enough that it doesn’t need to be.
Here’s something I really appreciate: KitchenAid included both a full-size 13-cup work bowl and a 3-cup mini bowl that fits inside. This dual-bowl system has proven incredibly practical in real-world cooking. When I need to chop just a few cloves of garlic or process a small amount of herbs, I can use the mini bowl without having tiny ingredients flying around uselessly in the large bowl. Then, for bigger jobs, I swap to the full-size bowl. Having both options without needing to buy a separate mini chopper has simplified my kitchen considerably.
The three-speed options (high, low, and pulse) give you good control over texture without being overly complicated. I use low speed when I want more control over chopping or when processing softer ingredients. High speed is perfect for pureeing soups or making smooth hummus. The pulse function is what I reach for most often—it gives me precise control over texture, which is crucial when I’m trying to achieve perfectly diced vegetables rather than vegetable mush.
The build quality feels substantial in a way that inspires confidence. The die-cast metal base has genuine weight to it and stays absolutely planted on the counter during operation. I’ve had processors that inch their way across the counter when working hard, but the KitchenAid doesn’t budge. The twist-lock bowl system is satisfyingly secure—you hear and feel it lock into place, and it stays locked even when processing tough ingredients.
One feature that seemed minor when I first got this processor, but has become surprisingly valuable, is the integrated accessory storage case. All the blades and discs have dedicated spots in a storage box that clips right onto the processor. No more digging through drawers trying to remember where you put the shredding disc. Everything stays together and organized. When you’re making dinner and dealing with three other things simultaneously, this kind of organization matters more than you might think.
The sealed bowl design is another thoughtful touch. When I’m processing liquids or making dressings, nothing leaks out even when the bowl is fairly full. I’ve made several batches of mayonnaise and vinaigrettes without any messy drips down the side of the bowl.
Now, the honest assessment of trade-offs. At $160-$230, this processor costs notably more than the Ninja models while offering similar capacity. The question is whether the KitchenAid’s premium features—the ExactSlice system, dual bowls, better build quality, and KitchenAid’s reputation for durability—justify the price difference. For me, they absolutely did. The ExactSlice system alone has proven so useful that I’d pay extra for it again without hesitation.
The size does require meaningful storage space. If you’re working with a compact kitchen, you’ll need to plan for where this will live. I keep mine on the counter since I use it regularly, but it’s not a small appliance.
Cleaning isn’t difficult, but there are more parts compared to simpler processors. The mini bowl, both blades for each bowl size, the disc, and the main bowl all need washing. Everything is dishwasher safe, which helps, but it’s still more pieces than the budget models. I’ve found it takes me about five minutes to clean everything thoroughly, which is entirely reasonable for what this processor can do.
Who is this processor ideal for? Home cooks who want premium features without premium prices. Families who cook regularly want a processor that will last for years. Anyone who frequently slices vegetables and gets frustrated with one-size-fits-all slicing discs. People who value thoughtful design and quality construction but have a reasonable budget. If you’re trying to decide between a budget model and a premium model, the KitchenAid often represents the smart middle path.
Pros:
- ExactSlice system with an external lever offers unmatched slicing versatility
- Dual bowl system (13-cup and 3-cup) handles both large and small tasks perfectly
- Solid 500-watt motor maintains consistent power under load
- Substantial die-cast metal base provides exceptional stability
- Integrated storage case keeps all accessories organized
- Three speeds plus pulse give good control over texture
- Excellent build quality suggests years of reliable service
- KitchenAid’s brand reputation for durability and customer support
Cons:
- Higher price than budget models with similar capacity
- Requires significant storage space
- More parts to wash compared to simpler designs
- A heavier weight makes it less convenient to move frequently
Price: $39-$70 | Capacity: 10 cups | Motor: 450 watts
Let me be completely upfront: the Hamilton Beach 70730 isn’t going to win any awards for power or premium features. But here’s what it will do—it will handle basic food processing tasks reliably without costing more than a nice dinner out. After testing this processor for months, I’ve developed a genuine appreciation for what it offers at its incredibly accessible price point.
This processor is perfect for someone in a very specific situation: you’re just starting to cook more seriously, you’re not sure how much you’ll actually use a food processor, you’re on a tight budget, or you need a basic processor for a dorm room, first apartment, or vacation home. At $39-70, this is an entry point that lets you explore food processor cooking without financial stress.
The 450-watt motor is admittedly modest compared to the 1000+ watt powerhouses we’ve discussed. But let’s talk about what it actually handles well: chopping vegetables for stir-fries or salads, making simple salsas, shredding cheese, slicing vegetables for everyday cooking, and preparing basic dips like hummus or guacamole. These are the tasks most people use a food processor for most often, and the Hamilton Beach handles them all competently.
I’ve chopped countless onions, peppers, and carrots with this processor, and as long as you’re patient and use the pulse function properly, you get acceptably uniform results. Is it as precise as the Cuisinart or Breville? No. But when you’re making tacos on a Tuesday night, the difference truly doesn’t matter. The vegetables get chopped, dinner gets made, and you didn’t spend $200 to make it happen.
The 10-cup capacity is actually pretty impressive for a budget processor. It’s larger than the Ninja BN601’s 9-cup capacity, which means you can handle decent-sized batches without constant emptying and refilling. I’ve made hummus for a small gathering, processed vegetables for multiple meals, and prepared salsa for taco night without feeling constrained by capacity.
The big feed tube is another pleasant surprise at this price point. It’s wide enough to accommodate whole tomatoes, large chunks of cheese, and most vegetables without extensive pre-cutting. This speeds up prep work considerably and makes the processor more convenient to actually use.
The simplicity is actually an advantage. There are two speeds plus pulse—that’s it. No complicated settings, no confusion, no wondering which button to press. You put ingredients in, choose a speed, and press the button. My teenage son figured it out without reading any instructions. Sometimes, simple is exactly what you want.
Cleaning is straightforward. The bowl, lid, and blade are all dishwasher safe. The uncomplicated design means there aren’t a lot of crevices where food gets trapped. I can have it cleaned and put away in about three minutes. For a budget appliance that you might use several times a week, easy cleaning is crucial—it’s the difference between actually using your food processor and letting it collect dust in a cabinet.
Now for the honest limitations, because they’re real and important to understand before you buy. The 450-watt motor is adequate for standard tasks but will struggle with tougher jobs. Don’t expect to make stiff bread dough or process completely frozen ingredients. When I tried to make a large batch of pizza dough, the motor labored noticeably. For pie crust or small batches of soft dough, it works fine, but this isn’t a dough-making powerhouse.
The build quality reflects the budget price. The plastic is thinner than premium models, the bowl doesn’t feel quite as sturdy, and the overall construction is noticeably lighter. However, with reasonable care, it holds up perfectly well for its intended use. I’ve been using this processor regularly for months, and nothing has broken or failed.
The blade is basic stainless steel without the micro-serrations or specialized geometry of premium blades. This means chopping performance is good but not exceptional. You’ll need to pay closer attention and potentially use more pulses to achieve uniform results. For someone new to food processors, there’s a slightly steeper learning curve.
The slicing and shredding discs produce acceptable but not perfectly uniform results. When I sliced potatoes, there was noticeable variation in thickness. For everyday family dinners, this doesn’t matter much. For fancy dinner parties where presentation is crucial, you might notice the difference.
Who is this processor perfect for? College students learning to cook in their first apartment. Budget-conscious families who need basic food processing capability without breaking the bank. Anyone who wants to try using a food processor before committing to a more expensive model. People who furnish a vacation home or rental property. Anyone who knows they’ll only use a food processor occasionally for simple tasks.
Who should skip this and invest more? Serious home cooks who will use a food processor multiple times weekly. Anyone who regularly makes dough or processes tough ingredients. People who want their food processor to last 10+ years with heavy use. Home cooks who value precision and perfectly uniform results.
My honest take: at $39-70, this processor offers remarkable value for basic food processing needs. It’s not pretending to compete with $400 processors, and that’s fine. It fills a real need for affordable, functional food processing, and it does that job well. If you’re genuinely uncertain whether you’ll use a food processor enough to justify spending $150+, starting with the Hamilton Beach is a smart, low-risk way to find out.
Pros:
- Extremely affordable entry point at $39-70
- Surprisingly large 10-cup capacity for the price
- Wide feed tube reduces prep work
- Simple operation anyone can master immediately
- Easy to clean with dishwasher-safe parts
- Adequate performance for common cooking tasks
- Low financial risk for trying food processor cooking
Cons:
- 450-watt motor struggles with tough or large-volume tasks
- Lighter build quality doesn’t feel as durable as premium models
- Basic blade produces good but not exceptional results
- Slicing and shredding discs lack the precision of higher-end models
- Not suitable for heavy-duty use or demanding recipes
- Motor can labor when processing stiff doughs
Understanding Food Processor Capacity
Food processor capacities typically fall into three categories: small processors hold 6-9 cups, medium-sized models accommodate 10-13 cups, and large processors can handle 14-16 cups or more. However, understanding what these numbers mean for actual cooking is important.
The stated capacity is the maximum the bowl can hold, but the effective working capacity is usually about 75% of that number. A 14-cup processor realistically handles about 10-11 cups of ingredients before efficiency drops. Overfilling leads to uneven processing, with ingredients at the top remaining uncut while those at the bottom turn to mush.
During our testing, we found that capacity needs vary significantly based on cooking habits. A couple who cook dinner most nights rarely needs more than 8-9 cups of working capacity. However, families who meal prep for the week or frequently entertain benefit substantially from larger 13-16 cup models.
Consider not just family size but cooking style. If you make large batches of soup, salsa, or hummus, a larger capacity prevents the frustration of processing multiple batches. Conversely, if you mainly use your processor for quick chopping tasks, a smaller model will suffice and be easier to store.
We also tested the mini bowls included with some processors. These proved surprisingly useful for small tasks like chopping garlic, mincing ginger, or making small amounts of sauce. If you frequently need to process small quantities, a processor with a mini bowl attachment eliminates the inefficiency of using a large bowl for tiny amounts of ingredients.
Motor Power: What Actually Matters
Motor wattage is often emphasized in food processor marketing, but our testing revealed that raw power isn’t everything. The relationship between motor design, blade geometry, and bowl shape matters more than wattage alone.
We tested processors ranging from 350 watts to 1,200 watts. Surprisingly, the 720-watt Cuisinart Custom performed nearly identically to the 1,200-watt Breville Sous Chef in most tasks. The difference became apparent only in specialized scenarios like grinding very hard cheese or kneading stiff dough.
What matters more than peak wattage is how the motor performs under sustained load. Some high-wattage motors we tested struggled to maintain consistent speed when processing tough ingredients, while others powered through without any slowdown. This consistency, often related to motor quality rather than raw power, significantly affects processing results.
Induction motors, found in premium processors, offer advantages over standard motors. They run cooler, maintain more consistent speeds under load, and typically last longer. However, they also add considerably to the cost. For most home cooks, the standard motors in mid-range processors provide perfectly adequate performance.
During testing, we noted that motor quality became most apparent in dough-making and grinding tasks. When making pizza dough, lower-quality motors bogged down noticeably, sometimes slowing to half their normal speed. The best motors maintained a consistent speed throughout the entire kneading process.
Noise is often correlated with motor quality. Cheaper motors tend to be louder and produce more vibration. If you’re sensitive to noise or frequently process ingredients when others are sleeping, a quieter motor is worth considering. The Cuisinart Custom 14-Cup earned recognition as one of the quietest models in Consumer Reports testing, making it an excellent choice for noise-conscious households.
Feed Tube Design and Why It Matters
The feed tube is where ingredients enter the processor, and its design significantly impacts user experience. During our testing, we found that feed tube design affects prep time, processing efficiency, and safety.
Standard feed tubes measure about 3-4 inches in diameter. This accommodates most vegetables when cut into halves or quarters. We tested preparing salads and found that standard tubes required about 5-10 minutes of prep time to size ingredients appropriately.
Wide-mouth feed tubes, measuring 5-6 inches in diameter, reduce prep time substantially. The Breville Sous Chef’s 5.5-inch feed tube lets us process whole tomatoes, bell peppers cut in half, and large potatoes with minimal cutting. For someone who meal preps regularly or cooks for large groups, this time savings adds up significantly.
However, wide feed tubes have a downside. When processing small items like garlic cloves or cherry tomatoes, they can bounce around rather than being forced into the blade. Multiple feed tube sizes solve this problem. The best-designed processors we tested included a large outer tube with a smaller inner tube that could be inserted for processing smaller ingredients.
The food pusher that fits into the feed tube also matters. It should fit snugly without gaps that let ingredients escape, but move smoothly without sticking. Some pushers we tested included measurement markings, allowing you to measure liquids as you pour them through the feed tube—a useful feature when making emulsified sauces.
Safety considerations are paramount. All food processors include interlocks that prevent operation unless the bowl and lid are properly secured. During testing, we verified that these mechanisms worked reliably and couldn’t be easily bypassed. We also evaluated whether the feed tube design prevented fingers from reaching the blade, even when using the pusher.
Blade and Disc Quality Makes a Real Difference
The blades and discs that come with a food processor determine what tasks you can accomplish and how well the processor performs them. Through our testing, we learned that blade quality varies dramatically between models.
S-Blades (Chopping Blades)
The standard S-shaped chopping blade is the workhorse of any food processor. Blade sharpness, geometry, and material quality all affect performance.
Stainless steel blades resist corrosion and maintain their edge longer than cheaper alternatives. During our extended testing, we noticed that lower-quality blades dulled noticeably after a few months, requiring more pulses to achieve the same results.
Blade shape matters too. Some blades we tested had more aggressive angles that grabbed and pulled ingredients into the cutting edge more effectively. These processors required fewer pulses to achieve uniform chopping. However, aggressive blades sometimes over-processed soft ingredients, turning them mushy before harder pieces were adequately chopped.
Micro-serrated blades performed best in our tests. The tiny serrations helped grab slippery ingredients like tomatoes without crushing them. When making salsa, processors with micro-serrated blades produced cleaner cuts that retained more juice and flavor.
Slicing Discs
Slicing discs should produce uniform slices from the first piece to the last. We tested this by slicing entire potatoes and measuring slice thickness throughout the process. Some processors produced excellent initial slices but became increasingly inconsistent as we processed more ingredients.
The best slicing discs we tested had multiple cutting edges arranged in a pattern that pulled ingredients through cleanly. Single-edge discs sometimes bounced off harder vegetables, producing irregular slices.
Adjustable slicing discs offer the most versatility. Rather than swapping discs to change thickness, you adjust a dial or lever. The KitchenAid’s ExactSlice system proved particularly convenient during testing, allowing thickness changes without removing the lid.
Shredding Discs
Shredding performance varies more than most people realize. We tested shredding mozzarella cheese, a notoriously difficult task because the cheese tended to clump. The best shredding discs produced long, uniform shreds without clumping, while poor performers created irregular pieces and left large chunks unprocessed.
Disc hole size and arrangement matter. Discs with properly sized and spaced holes moved the cheese through smoothly. Poorly designed discs clogged frequently, requiring us to stop and clear them repeatedly.
Dough Blades
Some processors include specialized plastic dough blades designed to knead without cutting gluten strands. During our pizza dough tests, we found that these blades performed marginally better than standard metal blades. However, the difference wasn’t dramatic enough to make this a deciding factor in our recommendations.
Specialty Attachments
Premium processors sometimes include specialty attachments like julienne discs, French fry cutters, and grating discs. While these expand the capability, we found we rarely used them in practical cooking. Unless you have specific applications in mind, the standard blade and slicing/shredding discs handle the vast majority of kitchen tasks.
Ease of Cleaning: An Underrated Factor
After testing twenty processors for several months, cleaning emerged as a more important factor than we initially anticipated. A processor that performs brilliantly but is frustrating to clean will likely sit unused in your cabinet.
Bowl Design
Bowl design significantly affects cleaning difficulty. Smooth, seamless bowls are easiest to clean, with no crevices where food can hide. We tested cleaning various ingredients—from sticky dough to tomato sauce—and found that bowls with fewer seams and curves cleaned quickly under running water.
Some bowls include measurement markings molded into the plastic. While useful, these create small grooves where food can accumulate. During testing, we had to scrub these areas with a brush to remove all residue.
The bowl’s finish matters too. Glossy, smooth finishes release food more readily than matte or textured surfaces. After months of testing, some bowls showed staining from ingredients like turmeric or tomato sauce, while others maintained their clear appearance.
Lid Complexity
Simple lids clean faster. Lids with multiple moving parts, buttons, and crevices require more attention. The most frustrating designs we tested had small spaces around the feed tube that trapped food particles and were nearly impossible to clean without a dedicated brush.
The best-designed lids we tested had minimal seams and could be rinsed clean in seconds. We particularly appreciated designs where the pusher could be disassembled for thorough cleaning.
Blade Cleaning
Cleaning sharp blades requires caution. We found that blades with simple designs were safest to clean by hand. Complex blade shapes with multiple angles increased the risk of cuts during cleaning.
Some manufacturers provide blade storage cases that double as cleaning aids. These let you safely handle blades while brushing away stuck food. After several months of testing, we came to appreciate this feature more than we expected.
Dishwasher Safety
Most food processor components are marketed as dishwasher safe, but our long-term testing revealed concerns. After repeated dishwasher cycles, some plastic bowls showed clouding or developed small cracks. Rubber gaskets sometimes degrade, leading to leaks.
The safest approach we identified was washing bowls and lids on the top rack only and hand-washing blades and discs. This prevented the harsh heat of the dishwasher from damaging components while still simplifying the bulk of the cleaning process.
We tracked our cleaning time for each processor. The fastest designs cleaned in under two minutes, while the most complex took nearly five minutes. Over the course of regular use, this difference becomes significant.
Common Food Processor Mistakes to Avoid
Through our extensive testing and years of cooking experience, we’ve identified common mistakes that reduce food processor performance and can even damage the machine.
Overfilling the Bowl
The most common mistake is filling the bowl beyond its effective capacity. This leads to uneven processing, with ingredients at the top barely touched while those at the bottom turn to paste. During testing, we found that filling to about 75% of maximum capacity produced the best results.
When processing liquids or very wet ingredients, fill even less—about 50% capacity. This prevents overflow and ensures ingredients have room to move around the blade properly.
Processing Too Long
It’s tempting to hold down the pulse button or run the processor continuously until ingredients reach the desired texture. However, this often leads to over-processing. We found that using short, one-second pulses and checking progress frequently produces better results than continuous running.
Over-processing generates heat, which can affect ingredient quality. When making pie crust, excessive processing develops gluten, leading to tough pastry. When chopping herbs, too much processing bruises them and releases bitter compounds.
Ignoring the Pulse Function
The pulse function gives you control over texture. During testing, we achieved much better chopping results using pulse rather than continuous processing. Pulsing lets you check progress and stop at precisely the right moment.
For best results, we found that 8-12 one-second pulses produced uniform dicing for most vegetables. Soft ingredients needed fewer pulses, while harder vegetables needed a few more.
Neglecting to Cut Ingredients Appropriately
Even with a powerful processor, starting with appropriately sized ingredients matters. Ingredients should be roughly uniform in size so they process evenly. A potato half and small chunks will process at different rates, leading to inconsistent results.
During testing, we found that cutting ingredients into 1-2 inch pieces before processing produced the most uniform results. This applies even to processors with wide feed tubes.
Using Dull Blades
Blade sharpness significantly affects performance. If your processor suddenly requires more pulses to achieve results or produces uneven chopping, the blade likely needs sharpening or replacing.
We tested both fresh and intentionally dulled blades. The performance difference was dramatic. Dull blades required 50% more processing time and produced inferior results, with more crushing and less clean cutting.
Improper Blade Selection
Using the wrong blade for a task reduces efficiency and can damage the blade. The S-blade excels at chopping and pureeing but isn’t ideal for kneading dough. Slicing discs work for firm ingredients but produce poor results with soft items.
During testing, we documented which blade worked best for each task. Matching the right blade to your ingredient makes a significant difference in results.
Food Processor vs. Blender: When to Use Which
Many people wonder whether they need both a food processor and a blender. Through our testing, we’ve identified clear use cases for each appliance.
Food processors excel at tasks requiring precise texture control. When you want ingredients chopped rather than pureed, a food processor is the right choice. The pulse function gives you control over the final texture that blenders can’t match.
Blenders are superior for liquids and smoothies. Their tall, narrow design and blade position create a vortex that pulls ingredients down into the blade. This makes them ideal for smoothies, milkshakes, and pureed soups.
We found that food processors handle dry ingredients better than blenders. Making pie crust, cutting butter into flour, or grinding nuts works beautifully in a processor but poorly in most blenders. The processor’s wide bowl lets you scrape down the sides easily, while a blender’s narrow container makes this difficult.
For wet, thick mixtures like hummus or pesto, either appliance works, but we preferred the processor. The wider bowl makes it easier to scrape down the sides and check consistency. Blenders require stopping frequently to stir ingredients back down into the blade.
Shredding and slicing are exclusive to food processors. If you frequently need these functions—making coleslaw, slicing vegetables for gratins, or shredding cheese—a food processor is essential.
Maintenance and Care for Longevity
Proper maintenance extends your food processor’s lifespan significantly. Through our testing and research, we’ve developed maintenance practices that keep processors performing optimally.
Regular Cleaning
Clean your processor immediately after use. Dried food is much harder to remove and can stain plastic components. We found that a quick rinse immediately after use prevented most cleaning problems.
Pay special attention to the blade shaft and bowl bottom, where food can accumulate around gaskets and seals. A small brush helps dislodge stuck particles from these areas.
Blade Care
Handle blades carefully to avoid damage. Store them in a protective case or with edge guards to prevent dulling. We found that blades stored loose in drawers dulled faster than those properly stored.
Some manufacturers offer blade sharpening services. If your processor’s performance has declined, contact the manufacturer about sharpening rather than immediately replacing the unit.
Motor Care
Don’t run your processor continuously for extended periods. Most motors are designed for intermittent use, not continuous operation. If you need to process large quantities, work in batches with breaks between to let the motor cool.
If your processor smells burnt or the motor sounds strained, stop immediately. Continuing to use a struggling motor can cause permanent damage.
Gasket and Seal Inspection
Rubber gaskets and seals degrade over time. Inspect them regularly for cracks, hardening, or deformation. Most manufacturers sell replacement gaskets, which are inexpensive compared to replacing the entire unit.
We found that gaskets lasted longer when we kept them lightly lubricated with food-grade mineral oil. This prevented drying and cracking.
Storage
Store your processor with the bowl slightly ajar rather than locked in place. This prevents stress on the locking mechanism and lets air circulate, preventing moisture buildup.
If storing for extended periods, ensure all components are completely dry to prevent mold or mildew. We discovered moisture-related issues in several test units that weren’t thoroughly dried before storage.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long do food processors typically last?
Based on our testing and research, a quality food processor should last 10-15 years with proper care. We’ve heard from numerous users who have owned Cuisinart models for over a decade without any issues. The key factors affecting longevity are build quality, frequency of use, and maintenance practices. Budget models typically last 3-5 years with regular use.
Can I make hot soup in a food processor?
No, you shouldn’t process hot liquids in a food processor. The steam creates pressure that can force the lid off, creating a dangerous situation. Always let hot ingredients cool to room temperature before processing. According to the American Test Kitchen, hot liquids should be below 140°F before processing.
What’s the difference between continuous run and pulse?
Continuous run keeps the blade spinning constantly, which works for smooth purees and emulsifications. Pulse gives you short bursts of power with breaks in between, providing better control over texture. We found pulse produces superior results for chopping because you can stop at precisely the right moment before over-processing occurs.
Can food processors knead bread dough?
Most full-size food processors can handle bread dough, but there are limitations. The motor should be at least 600 watts, and you shouldn’t exceed the manufacturer’s recommended flour quantity. During testing, we successfully made pizza dough and basic bread dough, but stand mixers are better suited for large batches or stiff doughs.
Why does my food processor leak?
Leaking typically indicates a worn or damaged gasket, a cracked bowl, or improper assembly. Check that the bowl is properly locked in place and the blade is correctly seated. Inspect the gasket for cracks or deformation. Most manufacturers sell replacement gaskets for $10-20, which is much cheaper than replacing the entire unit.
Can I grind coffee beans in a food processor?
While technically possible, we don’t recommend it. Food processors produce uneven grinds that aren’t ideal for coffee. The large bowl makes it difficult to process the small quantities typically needed. A dedicated coffee grinder costs $20-30 and produces dramatically better results.
How do I prevent my food processor from walking across the counter?
Processors move across counters when the weight distribution is uneven or the feet have lost their grip. Place a damp towel or silicone mat under the processor for extra grip. Ensure the bowl isn’t overfilled, which creates an imbalance. If the feet are worn smooth, some manufacturers sell replacement feet.
Can I sharpen food processor blades myself?
Professional sharpening is safer and more effective than DIY methods. However, if you’re experienced with knife sharpening, you can carefully sharpen processor blades using a whetstone. Always wear cut-resistant gloves and work slowly. Most manufacturers offer sharpening services, and some sell replacement blades for $15-30.
What size food processor do I need?
For singles or couples, 8-9 cups is usually sufficient. Families of 3-5 benefit from 11-14 cup models. Large families or frequent entertainers should consider 14-16 cup processors. Remember that effective capacity is about 75% of stated capacity, so a 14-cup processor really handles about 10-11 cups efficiently.
Safety Considerations When Using Food Processors
Food processors are generally safe appliances, but their powerful motors and sharp blades require respect. Through our testing and safety research, we’ve identified key safety practices every user should follow.
Blade Handling
The most common food processor injuries involve blade handling. Always grip blades by their plastic hubs, never by the metal edges. When washing, use a brush rather than a sponge to avoid direct contact with sharp edges.
Store blades safely in their original packaging or a dedicated storage case. Loose blades in drawers pose a hazard when you reach in without looking. We recommend attaching bright tape or labels to blade storage locations as a visual reminder.
During our testing, we found that blade removal requires care. Some blades grip the spindle tightly and require gentle wiggling to remove. Never force a stuck blade—this can lead to slips and cuts.
Proper Assembly
All food processors include safety interlocks that prevent operation unless properly assembled. Never attempt to bypass these mechanisms. We tested the safety systems on all our recommended models and confirmed they function reliably.
Ensure the bowl locks fully into place before adding ingredients. The lid should close with an audible click or firm resistance. If the lid feels loose, don’t operate the processor—something isn’t properly aligned.
Child Safety
Food processors should be stored out of children’s reach. The sharp blades and heavy components pose serious injury risks. If you store your processor on the counter, ensure the cord is positioned where children can’t pull it down.
Some models include blade storage within the processor base, which seems convenient but may not be secure if children can access it. We prefer storing blades separately in a locked drawer or high cabinet.
Electrical Safety
Never immerse the motor base in water or operate the processor with wet hands. Ensure the cord isn’t damaged or frayed. If you notice any electrical issues—sparking, burning smell, or shocks—unplug immediately and contact the manufacturer.
Use the processor on a stable, level surface away from water sources. Don’t let the cord hang over the counter edge where it could be caught or tripped over.
How to Get the Most from Your Food Processor
Beyond basic chopping and slicing, food processors can handle numerous tasks that might surprise you. Our testing revealed several underutilized capabilities.
Making Nut Butters
Homemade nut butter is simple in a food processor. Start with roasted nuts and process continuously, scraping down the sides every 30-60 seconds. The nuts will progress from chopped to a paste to smooth butter. This typically takes 5-8 minutes, depending on the nut type. We successfully made almond butter, peanut butter, and cashew butter during testing.
The key is patience. The process seems to stall when the nuts form a ball, but keep processing. The oils will eventually release, transforming the mixture into smooth butter. Adding a small amount of neutral oil can speed the process.
Pie and Pastry Dough
Food processors excel at making pastry dough because they incorporate butter quickly without warming it. We achieved better, flakier pie crusts using a food processor than we did mixing by hand.
Cut cold butter into small cubes and pulse it with flour until the mixture resembles coarse crumbs. Add ice water gradually while pulsing just until the dough begins to come together. The entire process takes less than a minute, preventing gluten development that would make the crust tough.
Homemade Breadcrumbs
Transform stale bread into breadcrumbs in seconds. Tear bread into pieces and pulse until you reach the desired texture. For finer crumbs, process longer. For coarse crumbs suitable for coating, use fewer pulses.
Season the breadcrumbs while processing by adding herbs, garlic powder, or parmesan cheese. We stored homemade breadcrumbs in the freezer, where they kept for months and remained easily scoopable thanks to their low moisture content.
Vegetable Rice and Cauliflower Rice
Pulse raw vegetables into rice-sized pieces for low-carb alternatives to traditional rice. Cauliflower rice is most popular, but we also successfully made broccoli rice, zucchini rice, and even butternut squash rice.
Cut vegetables into 1-inch pieces and pulse 10-15 times until you achieve rice-sized pieces. Don’t over-process or you’ll create mush. Work in batches to avoid overfilling the bowl.
Frozen Desserts
Process frozen fruit into a texture similar to soft-serve ice cream. We achieved the best results with bananas, but berries and mango also worked well. The fruit must be completely frozen and cut into chunks before processing.
Add frozen fruit to the processor and pulse until it breaks down. Then process continuously, scraping down the sides as needed. The texture transforms from icy chunks to smooth, creamy “ice cream” in 2-3 minutes. Add cocoa powder, nut butter, or vanilla for flavor variations.
Hummus and Dips
Hummus made in a food processor is dramatically better than store-bought versions. We tested dozens of hummus recipes and found that processing the tahini and lemon juice first, then adding chickpeas, produces the smoothest texture.
For ultra-smooth hummus, remove the chickpea skins before processing. This tedious step makes a noticeable difference in texture. Adding an ice cube while processing also helps achieve restaurant-quality smoothness.
Pesto and Herb Sauces
Fresh pesto comes together in seconds. Process garlic first to mince it finely, then add nuts and pulse until coarsely chopped. Add herbs and pulse until chopped, then process continuously while drizzling in olive oil. Finally, add cheese and pulse to combine.
We found that the pulse-and-scrape technique produces better pesto than continuous processing. This prevents over-processing the herbs, which can make pesto taste bitter.
Environmental Considerations and Sustainability
As we become more conscious of our environmental impact, the sustainability of kitchen appliances matters. We considered several factors when evaluating food processors from an environmental perspective.
Durability and Longevity
The most sustainable appliance is one that lasts for decades rather than years. By choosing a well-built food processor that can be repaired rather than replaced, you reduce electronic waste significantly. According to the EPA, Americans generated 6.92 million tons of consumer electronics waste in 2019, much of which could have been avoided with more durable products.
The Cuisinart Custom 14-Cup and other quality models are designed for long-term use. Replacement parts like bowls, blades, and gaskets are readily available, extending the useful life far beyond cheaper alternatives that must be entirely replaced when components fail.
Energy Efficiency
Food processors use relatively little energy compared to many kitchen appliances. Even powerful models consume only 0.1-0.2 kWh per hour of operation. Given that most food processor tasks take less than five minutes, the actual energy consumption per use is minimal.
However, energy efficiency varies between models. Induction motors found in premium processors typically use energy more efficiently than standard motors. Over a 10-15 year lifespan, this efficiency can add up to modest energy savings.
Plastic Considerations
Most food processor bowls and lids are made from plastic, raising concerns about both safety and environmental impact. All our recommended models use BPA-free plastics, which are safer for food contact.
From a sustainability perspective, the plastics used in food processors are durable and designed for long-term use, which is preferable to single-use plastics. Some manufacturers are beginning to use recycled plastics in their products, though this remains uncommon in food processors.
Reducing Food Waste
One of the most significant environmental benefits of owning a food processor is its ability to reduce food waste. Vegetable scraps that might otherwise be discarded can be processed into soups, sauces, or stock bases. Overripe fruit can be transformed into smoothies or frozen desserts.
During our testing, we found ourselves wasting less food because the processor made it easy to use ingredients that were past their prime. Slightly soft tomatoes became pasta sauce, aging herbs turned into pesto for freezing, and wilted vegetables went into soup.
Which Food Processor Should You Buy?
After months of rigorous testing, we’re confident in our recommendations. For most people, the Cuisinart DFP-14BCNY 14-Cup represents the best combination of performance, durability, and value. It handles every task we throw at it with consistent, reliable results, and its proven track record suggests it will serve you well for many years.
If you’re a serious home cook who frequently tackles ambitious recipes and wants the absolute best performance, the Breville Sous Chef 16 Cup (BFP810) justifies its premium price with superior power, capacity, and features. The 1450-watt motor, extra-wide feed tube, and 24-position adjustable slicing disc make it a joy to use, especially for large-batch cooking and meal prep.
Budget-conscious shoppers will find that the Ninja Professional Plus (BN601) delivers surprising performance for under $100. While it lacks some refinements of pricier models, it handles everyday tasks competently and represents excellent value.
For large families or anyone who regularly processes big batches, the Ninja Professional XL (NF701) offers impressive 12-cup capacity and 1200 peak watts of power at a reasonable price point. It’s the perfect choice for meal preppers and entertainers.
The KitchenAid 13-Cup (KFP1318) sits beautifully in the mid-range sweet spot, offering premium features like the ExactSlice system and dual bowls without the premium price tag. It’s ideal for home cooks who want quality and versatility without maxing out their budget.
For those just starting out or on a very tight budget, the Hamilton Beach 70730 provides basic food processing capability at an incredibly accessible price. While it won’t impress power users, it handles common tasks adequately for casual cooks.
Ultimately, the best food processor for you depends on your specific needs, cooking habits, and budget. We’re confident that any of our recommended models will serve you well and prove to be a worthwhile investment in your kitchen.
